An analysis of the differences in warfare of world war one and world war two

It is sobering to consider that more resources, mate- rial, and human lives approximately 50 million dead were expended on the war than on any other human activity. The debate over the origins of World War I had become something of a cottage industry among historians in the s and s. Yet the question of origins rarely arises over World War II, except on the narrow issue of whether U. Roosevelt had advance knowledge of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

An analysis of the differences in warfare of world war one and world war two

Comment The man who would go down in history as the father of chemical warfare acted as his own guinea pig to test his invention. The experiment was successful.

The scientist, himself a war enthusiast, began coughing convulsively; he grew pale and had to be carried away on a stretcher. About three weeks later, German troops used chlorine gas for the first time on a mass scale during combat on the Western Front near the Flemish city of Ypres in Belgium, deploying a total of tons of the substance.

At first, French soldiers thought the shimmering cloud was intended as a diversionary tactic. But then, suddenly, they began flailing about with their hands in the air as they gasped for breath and collapsed on the ground.

As many as 1, were killed and 3, wounded. Haber observed the event from a safe distance. The Birth of Weapons of Mass Destruction In military history, the deployment of chlorine gas in Ypres is considered the moment when weapons of mass destruction were born, and the rapid development of additional chemical weapons ensued.

It was a development that revolutionized warfare and has manifested itself in many ways: The use of chemical weapons in Flanders was the result of military desperation. All sides were looking for a way to break through enemy lines at the time and they spent billions on the search.

The result was an unprecedented advance in technology. Researchers invented mobile radio telephones, engineers constructed cannons capable of firing shells as far as kilometers Even a century after Ypres, armed conflicts continue to spur technological advances.

An analysis of the differences in warfare of world war one and world war two

Wherever wars are fought, money flows into military innovations. A Preparedness to Invest Prior to World War I, German politicians and generals had rejected a number of defense projects, but the conflagration of violence that enveloped Europe in triggered a flood of investment.

One example was the flamethrower, which had already been patented by a Berlin engineer all the way back in But it was first deployed on a large scale during the course of the war, in the February battle at Verdun.

The jet of fire had a range of 35 meters feet. The tank also developed quickly during the Great War, though the allies were in the lead.

History and Hardware of Warfare

Just 10 years later, the British rolled with their tanks into the Battle of the Somme. The Central Powers followed up much too late and developed their own tanks.

The telephone, for example, became the most important means of communication during World War I. On average, each army corps received 5, calls a day. Bythe German army had installed a ,kilometermile long network of cables for its field telephones.

An analysis of the differences in warfare of world war one and world war two

The fact that the lines could easily be cut in trench warfare promoted the deployment of radio equipment. Each side reacted swiftly to progress made by the other. At the beginning of the war, aircraft squadrons were primarily used to conduct surveillance on the front.

But proved to be a watershed moment. French fighter pilot Roland Garos installed a machine gun on his Morane-Saulnier monoplane. In response, the Germans developed the Fokker fighter plane, which included synchronization gear that enabled it to fire in the direction of flight through the arc of its spinning propeller without hitting the blades.

But they, too, began to deploy poison gas beginning in September All told, the parties to the conflict usedtons of chemical weapons between and War is almost never completely “inevitable”.

In almost all cases, war results when two or more sides of a conflict think they are right about a problem and think that they can win. In this case, they believe that the potential bloodshed and casualties that will happen as a result of war is.

World War Warfare was one of the greatest examples of technological advancement and strategic challenge, with the introduction of inventions such as the aircraft and the tank the battlefield transformed from attrition as scene in the early years of the war to decisive by the end of the war.

Compare and Contrast World War 1 & World War 2 | Jotted Lines

After studying WWI in the past, 9th grade students seem to have a minimal understanding about trench warfare and general apathy about the human effects of war. This lesson was designed to give them a realistic, first person account though the analysis of two photos of troops living in .

Here’s a Point-by-point analysis of major differences: The Conflict. World War I was centred in and around regardbouddhiste.com world warring nations were divided into two groups namely ‘The Central Powers’ and ‘The Allied Powers’.

The fact that the lines could easily be cut in trench warfare promoted the deployment of radio equipment. The world's first "mobile phones" weighed 50 kilograms ( pounds). Each side reacted swiftly to progress made by the other.

At the beginning of the war, aircraft squadrons were primarily used to conduct surveillance on the front. What were the primary differences between World War 1 and World War 2? Update Cancel. Although I would say that World War One was more violent, due to the nature of trench warfare, World War Two had more advanced technology, and better weapons.

World War II | Weapons and Warfare